Saturday, February 11, 2006

FOR VICTORY

22 Comments:

Blogger B.a.D said...

win at all costs no matter what the cost to the world or to other people

sounds about right

6:20 PM  
Blogger yochanan said...

not to worry b.a.d. i guess you want saddam back so he can murder more kurdish people 300,000 weren't enough for you.

9:42 PM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

thats funny

i thought we went in because he had WMD's, since he'd been murdering people for decades and it was never a problem BEFORE the WMD's

8:56 AM  
Blogger yochanan said...

B.A.D. you did not go anywere.

5:19 PM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

good point

YOU we're the ones that went in because YOU thought he had WMD's, since he'd been murdering people for decades and it was before a problem BEFORE the WMD's.

My mistake.

9:37 PM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

34%!


NICE

5:58 AM  
Blogger yochanan said...

what do you call a NDP'ER? a looser

1:46 PM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

hahahaha...

you really know where the pressure points are don't you?

the worst part is you consider yourself informed.

4:18 PM  
Blogger yochanan said...

bad i would say the vast majority of Americans have never even heard of the n.d.p. much less the independence party of Alberta.

5:12 AM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

exactly... at least we agree on that.

5:11 PM  
Blogger yochanan said...

I am impressed with P.M. Harper in the fact that his first trip out side of Canada was to see CANADIAN FORCES IN AFGANISTAN.

hip hip horay.

1:33 PM  
Blogger yochanan said...

Well I have been in every prov between Victoria B.C and St Johns Newfoundland. Including P.E.I. and some french islands in the gulf of st. lourance that aren't even part of Canada.

How many Americans even know what the War Measures act was? Much less be in Quebec City when the federal gov't of Canada called out the troops all over Quebec prov.?\

1:37 PM  
Blogger Steven said...

WMD's can be moved. Probably to Syria. It is not like the lead-up to the was was secret or quick.

6:27 PM  
Blogger Steven said...

It was a known fact that Iraq had WMD's. Its idiotic to claim otherwise. How were the Kurds killed? Whats up with the name: "Chemical Ali". We need to find those weapons so that they can not be used.

6:29 PM  
Blogger Steven said...

B.A.D.
We went in for many reasons. Firstly was his links to the Taliban in 9/11, but the President of the US made this seem like a one goal war by harping on about WMD's. That is not nessessary, there were many reasons to overthrow Saddam.

6:31 PM  
Blogger Marsupilami's lair said...

WMD's were a pretexte because the world would never acknowledge another reason. The US went there to overthrow Saddam, spread democracy and defend their widest interest i.e. having democratic and thus reliable allies.

1:48 PM  
Blogger yochanan said...

why would anyone want to put on a t-shirt of a mass murder?

che butchered 10,000 cubans

if you want mass murders put on stalin, hitler, pol pot, or mao

7:34 PM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

Marsupilami's lair said...
WMD's were a pretexte because the world would never acknowledge another reason. The US went there to overthrow Saddam, spread democracy and defend their widest interest i.e. having democratic and thus reliable allies.

EXACTLY
eg-friggin-xactly

6:00 AM  
Blogger B.a.D said...

and if they had WMD's, where are they?

6:01 AM  
Blogger yochanan said...

saddam used WMD'S to murder the Kurds

http://www.beyan.net/halabja/

Saddam used WMD'S TO DO HALABJA

but leftist created genocide like what joe stalin, mao, ho, che, or pol pot did is never mentioned by our so called peacenicks.

1:58 PM  
Blogger Chris in MB said...

yochanan,
you have a good point regarding the chemical weapons, many choose not to define them as WMD for unknown reasons

2:55 PM  
Blogger yochanan said...

There is only one solution; destroy Iran, completely, utterly with strategic airpower and nuclear weapons.

Let's look at the facts:

1.) Iran is ruled by a fascist mullohcracy which recently issued a fatwa sanctioning the use of nuclear weapons.

2.) Ahmadinejad has boasted that Iran wants to "wipe Israel off the map."

3.) A few years ago, Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani—a man considered "moderate" by the standards of the Iranian regime—boasted that "a single atomic bomb has the power to completely destroy Israel."

4.) Ahmadinejad claims the Holocaust is a hoax.

5.) Ahmadinejad has publicaly said that the the United States is in its "last throes," an ofuli (sunset) power destined to be superceded by the toluee (sunrise) of the Islamic republic.

So what would be the world reaction to such a country being totally destroyed?

I don't mean a few critical weapons factories destroyed, not a few casualties inflicted on the Iranian military. I mean the entire country being destroyed in an hour or less under mushroom cloud after mushroom cloud.

They will look at what prompted the US to launch such a massive assault against Iran, and conclude that it is in their best interests to NOT annoy the US in any manner whatsoever after the US has quite publically demonstrated it's return to Eisenhowerian defense policies; we won't maintain a large army, we won't fight your countries, we'll just destroy them and go home.

In the calculus of internal politics all over the world; dictators such as Musharraf, Mubarak, Quaddafi and whoever else will look at the smoking radiating ruin of Iran and conclude that the price to pay in internal dissent fostered by them brutally suppressing any Islamic movements will be insignificant next to the greater price; their country being destroyed, totally, by the United States.

5:09 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home